My professional blogspective on the latest green building trends, world-changing construction technologies and everything net-zero. The views expressed on this blog are my personal opinions. I look forward to reading your own opinions, feedback and questions.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Looking at Windows

Windows are designed to be look through, but occasionally, we look at them.  What we see depends on our perspective.  Architects may see the design, building scientists will look for air or water leaks,  the cleaning staff will immediately assess the difficulty of reaching all the panes.  Windows are often the battleground for preservationists vs energy retrofits, with several myths promulgated by both camps.

Myth 1: Historical windows are always better.  According to the National Register of Historic Places, the minimum age for historical is 50 years.  In 1966, when the agency was established, this timeline would have referred to buildings from 1916 and earlier.  Windows would have been built out of solid heartwood, possibly designed with removable interior sash stops, allowing for full access for cleaning, repair or replacement.   However, a 50 yr old building also now includes the “mid-century” homes, some of which had single-pane aluminum crank-out windows.   One would be hard pressed to figure out anyway in which these would be better than a replacement energy efficient window.  

Myth 2: New windows are always worse. This referred to  vinyl and aluminum windows, which don’t have the longevity of wood, nor could they match the look.  However, the new pultruded fiberglass windows have a narrower profile similar to wood, can be purchased with exterior muntins to simulate divided lite panes, and very low heat conductivity.  From an environmental standpoint, fiberglass takes the least amount of energy to produce and has the longest life expectancy of any window frame material.  This provides an option which satisfies both historical integrity and energy concerns.


Debunking the myths, what is the best way to proceed?   Decided if the window style is an intrinsic part of the existing architectural design, or the intended design of the remodel.  Not every old building is historical or architecturally pleasing.  Can the windows be repaired or improved for air and water sealing?  (link to the retrofit of the Empire State Building) Existing fixed windows from the 60’s can often be left in place, supplemented by an additional fixed double pane on the interior.  Interior storms can provide the extra protection while retaining the historical exterior of operable windows. And if the decision is to replace new windows, spring for high quality, energy efficient, long service life.  Make sure they are installed with proper flashing and window pans.  This is a big investment which you don’t want to have to revisit in 10 years time.   This is an investment not only in energy savings, but comfort, ease of maintenance, and functionality.  What you see is what you get.

4 comments:

kent said...

Hi Vera
I am in the middle of fixing the glazing and re-staining the single pane windows in my 1992 home. With 13- 9/6 sash to work on I have plenty of time to dwell on using this window system. My thoughts on it are this. If I continue to take the time every 18 to 20 years to bring the window glazing up to snuff I will have a very low embeded energy number over the years compared to a thermo pane window which lets say lasts twenty years but then must be totally replaced, I use a homebuilt interior storm sash that so far hasn't clouded up as I first feared it might. My three pane system might not have quite as high an R-value as what I could have used but over the long term I feel good about the trade off.
Don't get discouraged about reader ship. The comment log in is tedious and exasperating. This is the second time I have typed this after it rejected my google sign in. Since I have posted before this should be a simple matter but of course its not. If this goes up I say, keep up the good work and I'm enjoying your thoughts on the subjects you have chosen.
Kent@nhicf.net

Vera Novak said...

Hey Kent - sorry about logistics of posting a comment. You bring up an interesting issue which I'd like to review in a later blog - Where and how can homeowners contribute their time/effort to provide the "sustainability" support to a contractor?.. Hmmm Good luck on those sashes. I like your solution. I have a similar set of windows awaiting me on completing of my PhD!

kent said...

Hi Vera
From kent@nhicf.net

Here are two sites you might be interested in. Check out the comments section on the first site to follow the thread from Collingswood NJ Preservation Commission.

http://www.preservationnation.org/magazine/2009/march-april/ma09window.html

http://www.preservationnation.org/main-street/main-street-news/2009/04/greening-MS-buildings.html

Submitted by Collingswood NJ Historic Preservation Commission at: March 30, 2009
Do the math - don’t rely on exaggerated sales pitches Investigate what improvements will save real energy and be a good return on your investment? A homeowner's easiest energy saving investment may be a programmable thermostat. Used properly, the thermostat can pay for itself in less than a month! Next, check your roof insulation and caulking. Beef-up your home’s insulation! It is important to insulate your roof; remember heat rises. This will cost far less and yield more energy savings than replacing windows. Check your home heating system. Older homes often have very inefficient furnaces and boilers. Want to save 30% to 40% on your heating bill? It is not what those advertising campaigns lead you to believe. Although not as ........

Andy said...

Thanks for those websites Kent