![]() |
| No Electricity - No Trains |
What about the power outage in 2003, which affected more
than 50 million people, caused by a power surge in the Midwest? Or in 2007,
which left the Queens area of New York in the dark for as long as nine days? OR in 2008, when a failed switch in Miami
left 4 million people without power?
U.S. energy experts
say that a failure such as in India is unlikely to happen in the US. They cite the fact that our electric grids
are segmented into three parts, with safeguards to prevent an outage in one
system from tripping in another.
Great, but one third of the USA
is still a pretty good size! And, 75%
of the power outages in the U.S. are caused by weather. But as we saw with the Derecho event earlier this summer, extreme power events are
on the rise – and there is more human infrastructure which is at risk as we
build and expand. The experts also say
that the US generates more than enough electricity to meet demand and always
have power in reserve. While that may be true, there remain very crucial issues of updating the grid from analog to digital, installing smart
metering which could self-monitor, self-heal, and minimize the repercussion
of an individual incident.
A greater danger is lurking in cyberspace. Apparently, the vulnerabilities of the
existing electric grid control systems are available online,
and groups such as ‘Anonymous’ have already demonstrated their ability
to hack into the network. Many of the grids
and controls were built well before the concept of ‘cybersecurity.’ Energy regulators appealed to the Senate just
last week to consider the security risk this poses and to increase information
sharing.
Is this the right solution?
I am reminded that the best solution addresses the root of the problem,
doesn’t create more problems, and doesn’t create a dependency on the intervention
mechanism (usually more paperwork or bureaucracy.) In India, the solution was that many of the
businesses, healthcare and even homes have back-up diesel fuel generators,
since blackouts are relatively uncommon.
That is a large bandaid, but not a solution. A big part of the problem seems to be the
large dependencies created by current power plants and grids. This requires lots of controls to prevent
the spread of power outages.
![]() |
| Smart Towns - localized energy management |
I wonder if there might not be a more elegant solution by
decentralizing power into smaller areas. This would contain power outages and
reduce the scale of security threats. The management of the
grid would be more responsive to local conditions, and the fiscal management
more linked to the users. There is already a trending toward this concept from the
private sector, with Greensburg, Kansas
and towns Germany who are buying back their energy infrastructure (see
Ecobuildtrends Power
(ful) lessons from Greensburg). Japan
is developing Smart
Towns. The concept of a distributed grid has been
around for a long time, but often got pushback based on the type of power
generation. After all, not everyone
wants a coal-fired power plant in their back yard. But with developing technology in biofuel
from waste products, power generation from algae growth, cogeneration, combined heat and power plants,
the time might be right to reconsider
this equation.
Let’s keep the power-outage world of “Revolution’ TV show a
Hollywood imaginary world.






1 comment:
Exactly, the 'too big to fail' goes for utilities also. We should be thinking local for energy, food, banking, etc.
-Wil
Post a Comment