My professional blogspective on the latest green building trends, world-changing construction technologies and everything net-zero. The views expressed on this blog are my personal opinions. I look forward to reading your own opinions, feedback and questions.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Dehumidification + Cooling: A better mousetrap

For those of us in North America, indoor air cooling is the least of our worries right now, but the International Air-Conditioning Expo is taking place in Dallas this week and there is some news worth sharing.   Faithful blog readers will know that I have a bit of a problematic relationship with air conditioning, on the basis of the electrical consumption, the disconnect with the outdoors, and quite often, the noise.   However, my original beef was as a result of working with the  ICF industry, where the insulation often took care of the sensible load (the temperature),  leaving mostly the latent load (the humidity) to deal with.   Modern AC systems were NOT designed for this application.  More often than not, the AC system was oversized, would short cycle or hardly turn on at all, the house would be moist and cool, homeowners would leave for a vacation, come home to mold, and  - I would get the phone call from a frustrated homeowner.  All I wanted was a good dehumidifying system, with a bit of cooling. 

Finally, there seems to be a solution on the market, at least for commercial construction. Advantix Systems has developed a liquid dessicant system that first pulls the excess moisture out of the air, and then cools it to the right temperature.  This is considerably more efficient that traditional AC technology, which is based on the principle of cooling air to the dewpoint in order to draw off the condensed moisture.  This overcooled air is then re-heated to a more comfortable temperature.  The Advantix technology pulls air through a strong brine solution which absorbs the excess moisture. This brine water-filter also serves to clean the air of particulates larger than 5 microns, which covers most mold spores, pollen, and dust, but not smoke or insecticide.   For the engineering type, the  Advantix website has a detailed  schematic diagram, and for the rest of us, there is a very nifty video explaining the basic science of absorption and diffusion.  The website also provide the calculations behind their energy saving claims, and a mention of “competitive pricing.”  A few of the case studies offered projected savings,  which will hopefully be updated with actual performance numbers and payback periods as these figures become available.  Overall, I appreciate the transparency of information on the website.
This technology was initially developed to manage the air conditions of ice-skating.  The company is relatively new on American shores, but the USA President, Ms. Hannah Granade was named “Most Creative People in Business” in 2012 by Fast Company.  Certainly, Advantix is a company worth watching, and we can only hope that they will scale their product to residential size in the near future.

2 comments:

Trister Posten said...

In reading this post on reducing moisture levels, i became concerned. I was browsing through several home health blogs to determine what is a recommended level of interior humidity. I find it a bit frustrating that the levels suggested by building restoration specialists seem to suggest very low levels - often RH < 30%, obviously changing with climate and season. Many health blogs (people not buildings) seem to suggest that 40-60% is ideal ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474709/ ). When this is combined with requests to wear sweaters to work, I find myself starting to think that buildings should be serving people, not the other way around. We can preach energy efficiency and reduced incidents of wall moisture all we want, but if people are not showing up for work or have constant throat and air passage ailments, then we need to reconsider our strategies, codes, and professional advice. I would like to see a wall, fenestration, and attic space design that respects a 40% RH in Minnesota. Is this possible? And what about healthy (not minimal) air change rates? Some extra mechanical system support is acceptable. Thanks for any thoughts you may have.

Vera Novak said...

Tristan - you are quite right about people needing to be at the center of buildings. My perspective comes from the problem set of a)coming from a dry climate where I liked the low humidity and b)currently living in a climate where summer humidity is often 80% or more. A drop to 40% would be much prefereable, and thus the need for dehumidification. As for air balancing, look at systems that are low velocity, but more constant. The placement of the vents is also key - for example displacement systems with strategically placed vents/returns. 40% RH - don't see why ICFs wouldn't work just fine - it's a question of right-sized mechanicals.