Finally, there seems to be a solution on the market, at
least for commercial construction. Advantix Systems has
developed a liquid dessicant system that first pulls the excess moisture out of
the air, and then cools it to the right temperature. This is considerably more efficient that
traditional AC technology, which is based on the principle of cooling air to
the dewpoint in order to draw off the condensed moisture. This overcooled air is then re-heated to a
more comfortable temperature. The
Advantix technology pulls air through a strong brine solution which absorbs the
excess moisture. This brine water-filter also serves to clean the air of
particulates larger than 5 microns, which covers most mold spores, pollen, and
dust, but not smoke or insecticide. For
the engineering type, the Advantix
website has a detailed schematic diagram, and
for the rest of us, there is a very nifty video explaining the basic
science of absorption and diffusion. The
website also provide the calculations behind their energy saving claims, and a mention of “competitive pricing.” A
few of the case studies offered projected savings, which will hopefully be updated with actual
performance numbers and payback periods as these figures become available. Overall, I
appreciate the transparency of information on the website.
This technology was initially developed to manage the air
conditions of ice-skating. The company
is relatively new on American shores, but the USA President, Ms. Hannah Granade
was named “Most Creative People in Business” in 2012 by Fast Company. Certainly, Advantix is a company worth
watching, and we can only hope that they will scale their product to
residential size in the near future.





2 comments:
In reading this post on reducing moisture levels, i became concerned. I was browsing through several home health blogs to determine what is a recommended level of interior humidity. I find it a bit frustrating that the levels suggested by building restoration specialists seem to suggest very low levels - often RH < 30%, obviously changing with climate and season. Many health blogs (people not buildings) seem to suggest that 40-60% is ideal ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474709/ ). When this is combined with requests to wear sweaters to work, I find myself starting to think that buildings should be serving people, not the other way around. We can preach energy efficiency and reduced incidents of wall moisture all we want, but if people are not showing up for work or have constant throat and air passage ailments, then we need to reconsider our strategies, codes, and professional advice. I would like to see a wall, fenestration, and attic space design that respects a 40% RH in Minnesota. Is this possible? And what about healthy (not minimal) air change rates? Some extra mechanical system support is acceptable. Thanks for any thoughts you may have.
Tristan - you are quite right about people needing to be at the center of buildings. My perspective comes from the problem set of a)coming from a dry climate where I liked the low humidity and b)currently living in a climate where summer humidity is often 80% or more. A drop to 40% would be much prefereable, and thus the need for dehumidification. As for air balancing, look at systems that are low velocity, but more constant. The placement of the vents is also key - for example displacement systems with strategically placed vents/returns. 40% RH - don't see why ICFs wouldn't work just fine - it's a question of right-sized mechanicals.
Post a Comment